Living Waters Message Board
Return To The Living Waters Home Page
to refresh the saints...

These search engines are in no way affiliated with Living Waters.
Bible Search
Version: Passage:
Word Search
Search: for
Follow UpsPost Followupcfry@livwat.comLiving WatersFront Page
Re: state
Posted by caf - August 02, 2002 at 10:47:43am
1280x1024x32 - Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2
In Reply to:
state
Posted by ben - August 02, 2002 at 11:11:21pm:

I think separation of church and state is basically an excellent idea. I don't want the state (any state, no matter how apparently good willed) to mix into my relgious faith and choices (but it does and it will). I generally agree with the premise that state institutions should not require prayers or other religious behaviors. I surely don't want an official state church as there is in England, Germany, Russia, China, Italy, and many other nations.

However, the constitution didn't quite define or describe separation of church and state. It was apparently intended in the first amendment to prevent U.S. governments from sanctioning a particular church or religion over others, as has happened in most nations of the world in most of history. The current political and judicial atmosphere, rather than honoring the non-establishment clause, often seems to tend toward hostility rather than neutrality. There surely was no original intent to ban references to God in public places or prevent public officials from expressing their own faith. What seems to be profound hostility toward very mundane religious expression today might be ludicrous, if it did not reflect such a disturbing cultural turn toward destructive self-centered philosophies.

Follow Ups
-
Post A Followup
Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Quote original message:     Erase current comments:
Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Follow UpsTo the Topcfry@livwat.comLiving WatersFront Page